Follow us on

Q of the week

Q: Do clinical trials ever go wrong?

Get the Answer: 


A test to check for cancer of the cervix, the opening to a woman's womb. It is done by removing cells from the cervix. The cells are then prepared so they can be seen under a microscope.

Welcome Guest   [Register]  [Login]
EFGCP–EUCROF Joint Workshop Final Report   by  on 2010-08-20 12:12:20
Managing Clinical Trials   by  on 2010-07-15 16:05:32
US-FDA issues Revised Info Sheet Guidance on Clinical Investigator Disqualification   by  on 2010-06-13 10:11:41
US-FDA issues final guidance on Statement of Investigator (Form FDA 1572)   by  on 2010-06-13 10:07:59
Rising Clinical Trial Complexity Continues to Vex Drug Developers   by  on 2010-06-03 09:36:33
Investigator-Driven Clinical Trials: An ESF Forward Look   by  on 2010-06-03 09:27:58
NIH's Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) Proposed Rule   by  on 2010-05-27 11:42:00
AAP’s Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Studies to Evaluate Drugs in Pediatric Population   by  on 2010-05-13 11:39:54
Argentina: ANMAT - new regulatory update   by  on 2010-05-01 01:40:32
The Wall Street Journal's special supplement on clinical trials   by  on 2010-05-01 01:31:52
Major developments in EU Clinical Trial Guidances   by  on 2010-04-20 19:10:55
Analysis of the adverse reactions induced by natural product-derived drugs   by  on 2010-04-18 23:16:06
Newer Antibacterial Drugs for a New Century   by  on 2010-04-18 22:49:47
Newer Non-Statin Drugs for Reducing Cholesterol   by  on 2010-04-13 07:57:20
Practice Guidelines for Chronic Pain Management   by  on 2010-04-04 20:52:16
CONSORT III (2010)   by  on 2010-03-29 12:53:28
US FDA Draft Guidance on Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Impaired Renal Function   by  on 2010-03-20 12:25:16
US-FDA issues First Draft Guidance on Noninferiority Trials   by  on 2010-03-04 14:07:46
US FDA new rule on reporting information regarding falsification of data   by  on 2010-02-25 20:47:33
US-FDA Guidance for the Use of Bayesian Statistics in Medical Device Clinical Trials   by  on 2010-02-06 12:12:14
 Subject :FDA Slow to Debar Doctors Who Commit Crimes .. 2009-10-23 15:02:58 
Joined: 2009-07-24 14:37:58
Posts: 16
Dear All,

The Food and Drug Administration is slow to debar health professionals who have been convicted of crimes from doing research for the agency or overseeing the safety of patients in clinical trials, according to a government watchdog report released Thursday.

In one instance, it took the FDA 11 years to debar a doctor who had been convicted of 53 counts of criminal offense for, among other things, bribing an employee to conceal information about the attempted suicide of a clinical-trial patient and prescribing a drug without a license.

The FDA has the authority to bar doctors from overseeing the safety of patients in clinical trials if those health professional flout federal regulations. The FDA is required to disqualify doctors who are convicted of fraud or other crimes. However, it takes the agency an average of four years to strip doctors of their powers, according to a report by the independent Government Accountability Office.

Types of misconduct that can get doctors debarred include submitting false information to the FDA, forging patient consent forms and not reporting when a patient has an adverse reaction to an experimental drug.

The FDA said, in a response to the GAO, that it has tightened its debarment proceedings over the last several years and has established rigid deadlines to ensure health professionals who break the law get quickly stripped of their powers. The agency has also added extra staff to deal with these issues.

The report also shows that even when the FDA bars a doctor from participating in a clinical trial for a drug, that person can still oversee patients in experimental trials that involve medical devices. The process also works the other way: A doctor barred from overseeing trials involving medical devices can still participate in drug trials.

Further, the FDA doesn't have the authority to debar doctors, regardless of their misconduct, from participating in any form of the medical-device industry. The report says a health professional who was convicted of falsely advertising a laser device for treating eye disorders can't be debarred.

It's this loop hole and the FDA's slow response that Republican Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, hopes to close with a proposed bill that would require the FDA to debar doctors within one year of their being convicted of a crime or found committing fraud.

"I think it is especially inexcusable that the agency can't seem to quickly and consistently debar even convicted felons," Mr. Barton said in a press release.

Mr. Barton highlighted what he calls a "notorious" case. It took the FDA about five years to debar Anne Kirkman-Campbell, an Alabama physician who pled guilty to mail fraud and was sentenced to more than four years in jail related to a clinical trial for Sanofi-Aventis SA's antibiotic, Ketek.

The GAO says it recommends that the FDA be given debarment authority for medical devices, and that regulations be rewritten so any doctor debarred from one area of agency regulation is barred from participating in all others. The report notes that three doctors who either didn't follow FDA regulations or committed crimes still haven't been debarred. One of the cases stretches back to 2005.


IP Logged

Savitha:) :star:
Page # 

Powered by ccBoard