Follow us on




Q of the week

Q: How Do You Get Shingles?

Get the Answer: 

Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease is an ongoing condition that causes inflammation of the digestive tract, or the GI (gastrointestinal) tract (the gut).

 Forums
Welcome Guest   [Register]  [Login]
EFGCP–EUCROF Joint Workshop Final Report   by  on 2010-08-20 20:12:20
Managing Clinical Trials   by  on 2010-07-16 00:05:32
US-FDA issues Revised Info Sheet Guidance on Clinical Investigator Disqualification   by  on 2010-06-13 18:11:41
US-FDA issues final guidance on Statement of Investigator (Form FDA 1572)   by  on 2010-06-13 18:07:59
Rising Clinical Trial Complexity Continues to Vex Drug Developers   by  on 2010-06-03 17:36:33
Investigator-Driven Clinical Trials: An ESF Forward Look   by  on 2010-06-03 17:27:58
NIH's Financial Conflict of Interest (FCOI) Proposed Rule   by  on 2010-05-27 19:42:00
AAP’s Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Studies to Evaluate Drugs in Pediatric Population   by  on 2010-05-13 19:39:54
Argentina: ANMAT - new regulatory update   by  on 2010-05-01 09:40:32
The Wall Street Journal's special supplement on clinical trials   by  on 2010-05-01 09:31:52
Major developments in EU Clinical Trial Guidances   by  on 2010-04-21 03:10:55
Analysis of the adverse reactions induced by natural product-derived drugs   by  on 2010-04-19 07:16:06
Newer Antibacterial Drugs for a New Century   by  on 2010-04-19 06:49:47
Newer Non-Statin Drugs for Reducing Cholesterol   by  on 2010-04-13 15:57:20
Practice Guidelines for Chronic Pain Management   by  on 2010-04-05 04:52:16
CONSORT III (2010)   by  on 2010-03-29 20:53:28
US FDA Draft Guidance on Pharmacokinetics in Patients with Impaired Renal Function   by  on 2010-03-20 20:25:16
US-FDA issues First Draft Guidance on Noninferiority Trials   by  on 2010-03-04 22:07:46
US FDA new rule on reporting information regarding falsification of data   by  on 2010-02-26 04:47:33
US-FDA Guidance for the Use of Bayesian Statistics in Medical Device Clinical Trials   by  on 2010-02-06 20:12:14
 Subject :AAHRPP Issues Final Revised Accreditation Standards .. 2009-10-05 19:54:00 
Sree
Newbie
Joined: 2009-09-18 20:04:52
Posts: 16
Location
The Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP) recently issued the final version of the first major revision of its standards in its eight-year history.

AAHRPP is a non-profit organization that works with organizations that conduct human research to raise the level of protection for research participants. Available to organizations worldwide that conduct biomedical, behavioral or social sciences research involving human participants, the accreditation program utilizes a voluntary, peer-driven educational model.

Organizations must demonstrate that they have built extensive safeguards into every level of their research operation and that they adhere to the high ethical standards.

Strengthening Trust in Human Research with Effective, Consistent Protections Worldwide

AAHRPP streamlined the number of standards and increased flexibility in how to interpret them, even as it added or strengthened standards on global research, conflict of interest, community-based research, and data and safety monitoring.

As part of AAHRPP’s own quality improvement initiative, it undertook a comprehensive review of the standards, something that is planned to occur regularly. With government scrutiny of human research increasing, the urging of behavioral and social scientists to make human research protection meaningful to their research, and industry moving more clinical trials into the developing countries, AAHRPP responded by strengthening, updating and streamlining its standards.

While none of the new standards or revisions reflect major changes in the requirements for accreditation, the revisions do reflect a major regrouping of the standards, providing a more logical framework for a human research protection program (HRPP) and better definition of the primary roles and responsibilities of the entities that comprise an HRPP.

Overall, AAHRPP has reduced the number of standards from 22 to 15, and the number of elements, from 77 to 60.

AAHRPP began developing a set of Proposed Revised Accreditation Standards at the end of 2008, and presented them for public comment on June 1, 2009. When the comment period ended on July 30, 2009, AAHRPP used those comments to develop the Final Revised Accreditation Standards issued today.

Organizations wishing to apply for accreditation from now through February 28, 2010, may follow either the Final Revised Accreditation Standards or the Current Accreditation Standards in effect before October 1, 2009. Beginning on March 1, 2010, all new applicants will follow the Final Revised Accreditation Standards, which will then be referred to simply as the AAHRPP Accreditation Standards.

Readers will find the Final Revised Accreditation Standards and be able to compare them with the current accreditation standards on the Web at http://www.aahrpp.org/www.aspx?PageID=316. A version of the Evaluation Instrument for Accreditation based on the Final Revised Accreditation Standards, which organizations use to apply the standards to their own HRPPs, is also available on the Web site.
IP Logged
Page # 


Powered by ccBoard